Inglourious Basterds

I watch movies in theatres at the rate of three per annum if and only if sponsored by friends. I watched ‘Aayirathil Oruvan’ couple of weeks back, and thought maybe I should watch only one film every four years. What a tragedy!

I hardly watch television at home, leave alone movies. Half an hour is my maximum attention span. Either I find myself in the loo or mom finds me snoring in bed. My better half on the other hand is an ardent film buff. She would talk for hours about Pedro Almadovar when I clearly struggle to get past K Bhagyaraj. So I am hardly a match for her among a lot other things. My brother-in-law is a N- IMDB*. I think he watches movies full-time and writes code only when he is free and so should be paid accordingly. I am not sure if he carries tooth brush when he is traveling, but he sure carries his mini-suitcase like hard-drive full of movies. Making me watch Inglourious Basterds was part of a long term strategy by brother and sister to convert me into a tolerable movie watcher.

As if this duo was not enough, my buddy at office, who is a N-IMDB in his own right, did effective word of mouth marketing for the movie during lunch, tea breaks. That is the second plot just like it is in the movie. The result, I watched Inglorious Basterds yesterday night.

My first rendevous with Quentin Tarantino was during a sleepless night in San Jose. I was still coming to terms with Pacific Standard Time, and my colleague offered Kill Bill parts I and II. For a guy who snores before 30 minutes into any movie if watching alone, I watched Kill Bill Part I and Part II back to back well into the night and ended up going to office the next day noon.

Lengthy conversations, slow camera pan, long shots, sometimes the camera waits for the subjects to approach it, and multiple parts within the movie. They do not sound like the ingredients of a thriller, do they? Try Tarantino.

A Nazi Colonel Landa, known as a jew hunter, visits a small village to hunt down the last jew family. The neighborhood farmer tries to protect, in vain. The daughter of the Jew family somehow manages to run in a shot very reminiscent of the way the young Shaktivelu runs with the train whistle in the background in Nayagan. How long will you take to show this on screen? Tarantino takes a cool twenty minutes, and in the process majestically establishes Col. Landa’s character and sets the stage for the film. It is a handful of scenes like this that catapults the film to a different level.

Another thing I noticed about Tarantino, he does not attempt to explain everything. For e.g. He will not tell you how a gang of five, evidently alien, can casually enter the movie hall where the Fuhrer himself is coming to watch the film. Afterall the Fuhrer is no Goundamani. QT doesn’t care. Instead he will choose to start the scene with Col. Landa and take it from there. But what he does choose to explain, he does so with deadly effect leaving the audience stunned in their seats.

And that Col. Landa played by a guy called Christopher Waltz, this is HIS film.

On the down side, as is always the case with QT, there is loads of violence.

I am not qualified to say if Inglorious Basterds is great cinema or deserves a place in the IMDB all-time 50 rankings, etc. I never got a rank in high-school. I was told i need to pass all papers which never happened except in the finals. So me never liked ranking business. I leave that to N-IMDBs*. But as a below average movie rasigan, I watched the movie with suspense, and interest not knowing what will happen next. That to me is pure entertainment, pure cinema. The director as the designer of the film, should give a character to the film. And for that the director should have spunk and character himself. Tarantino, I think does that job quiet well. That is why he can make even the one millionth film on ‘pazhi vangum’ theme with punch.

And those aspiring to be great writers and directors, should watch the intro scene and the basement scene again and again and again. Those are Tarantino master class on screen writing and execution.

N-IMDB = Nadamaadum IMDB.

11 Responses to “Inglourious Basterds”

  1. karthigayen Says:

    hello prabhu,
    sweet surprise to know that you write about Q.tarantino, though i haven’t seen his latest i.b. I took note of him recently on Pulp Fiction (90s film) and immediately noted that his trademark is instilling ‘fear factor’ on viewers mind. Watch his guest appearance in his friend’s film http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0y-Qjjd-1U. This guy has got great passion for cinema. only other guy i know is, of course our Kamal Hassan.

  2. Gopinath Sundharam Says:

    One of the best movies indeed.

    A side note, now-a-days, I seem to not sit through most of the movies, especially the tamil ones. I usually watch a lot of movies earlier. Now, my Netflix DVDs are still unopened which came a month ago. Now, I usually run the movie on one browser tab, while I’m reading, coding on the other tabs, whenever there is a different sound on the movie, I look at it for say 2 minutes, if it doesn’t interest me, I switch back to reading.

    Looks like movie watching has become background sound to me these days and I can’t believe that myself. :)

  3. prabukarthik Says:

    karthigayen,

    Thanks for the link. This guy sure has passion for cinema. I’ve been reading his interviews in as many browser windows as possible since last night :)

  4. prabukarthik Says:

    gopinath,

    ada paavi, padam parkuradhu, cricket commentary range ku downgrade pannitiye da… :)

  5. Chakra Says:

    When I read the title, I thought you are cursing someone. :)

  6. Manikandan Says:

    A great film indeed. Nice observation. Its only the spunk and character that makes him stand out of the crowd.. Tarantino is an old school film maker, he hardly relies on CGI. this movie would be similar to a play relying only on its writing. How many war movies would one have seen without even a single tank, a marching parade of soldiers or frequent explosions just to show that they have the firepower. The only major outdoor scene in this war movie would be initial scene with the basterds exhibiting their talents..

    I didn’t know that you knew about our evil plans.. :).. and thinking back, i do forget my brush most times, but not my hdd :)..

  7. prabukarthik Says:

    Mani

    ahaa.. if a director does not rely on CGI, he is seen as old fashioned nowadays? i sure wish that those who relied on special effects will at some point be abandoned :)

    Your other comment on HDD and toothbrush is proof that what i say is no exaggeration :)

  8. prabukarthik Says:

    chakra,

    How i wish there was a tamil film comparable in quality to this one but titled ‘porambokku’.. i’d take that..how about you :)

  9. dagalti Says:

    //Afterall the Fuhrer is no Goundamani.//
    Thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain

  10. Pradeep Says:

    Pulp paarthaacha illaya? I dont know how I missed this QT post of yours. I should’ve watched Pulp about a 110 times so far, and read the script about 15 times. :-)
    If you havent watched it yet, pls do.

  11. prabukarthik Says:

    Pradeep

    Innum illai :( but its definitely on the ‘films to watch in 2010′ list

Leave a Reply