What i don’t understand with Arundhati Roy
Monday, October 30th, 2006Read this interview.
Very intelligent. Passionate. sooooo pro-poor. This much i understand.
She has written a few books. One was the designed, artistic, literary, booker-winning type - God of Small things. I fell in love with it’s style. I’m still in love with the style. I know there are 1000s who will disagree but lets just say its a matter of personal likes.
Then she has also written non-fiction. Against corporatization, globalisation etc. Wonderful writing. Thought provoking. Illuminating. So much so you are temporarily blinded from reality.
Let me tell what I don’t understand with Arundhati Roy. Most of her books are not read by the people she so eloquently writes about - the oppressed, disadvantaged, under privileged-types.
One of her books, The ‘Algebra of Infinite Justice’ was being priced at 250 bucks or thereabouts. So its way beyond the reach of the oppressed, disadvantaged people she is talking about.
Actually, its been read by MNC coolies like me. You know, the jobless, single, with all the time in the world and atleast enough money to buy a book from Landmark for 250 bucks. So where did i get this money from? You guessed it right, Thanks to offshore outsourcing and globalization.
So, she neither writes in a language so that the people for whom she is voicing can understand, nor are those people her target audiences in the first place.
Now these are the points in which i need some clarification.
A) Either she is a professional who specializes on writing about the other side of Globalization, Corporatization etc. Let’s not get into if its right or wrong. Remember, its free market economy - everything goes so long as there is a market.
If at all her style of writing has a market, let her do that. Why not? But in this case, she is as good or bad as an MNC coolie like me. Because she is writing about globalization, to folks who have benefitted from globalization, and makes money,along with her publisher (I think it was Penguin by the way).
She has got no right to cry foul about the MNC coolies, nor the government which supports such globalization, nor the Prime Ministers as if we are scum of the earth because she is very much part of the scum. She is catering to the scum. To put it in her style ‘The scum is her market’.
B) On the other hand, if she sees herself as a revolutionary, then she better starts the following soon
1) Translate all ther writings to all the regional languages, to start with, atleast malayalam - her own mother tongue, so that the ‘indigenous’ people (as she is so fond of calling them) can read, understand, get enlightened, and start a revolution.
2) Distribute her translated writings for free. At the very least, she can give a free download version on the net. So that she can reach more people soon and let her ideas catch on like wild-fire.
If she does neither A nor B then, then it means she is of type A but tries to project herself as B - a person worse than George Bush.
Need I say more??
[PS: I am ever so prepared to reverse my opinion and call her the Angel or Activist or whatever she likes to be called, if she can tell the world that she did not get any royalty from her Publisher MNC]